Last month, at the joint AMS/MAA meeting in San Diego, I spoke at the AMS “Current Events” Bulletin on the topic “Why are solitons stable?“. This talk was supposed to be a survey of many of the developments on the rigorous stability theory of solitary waves in dispersive wave models (e.g. the Kortweg-de Vries equation and its generalisations, nonlinear Schrödinger equations, etc.), although my actual talk (which was the usual 50 minutes in length) only managed to cover about half of the material I had planned.

More recently, I completed the article that accompanies the talk, and which will be submitted to the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. In this paper I describe the key conflict in these wave models between *dispersion* (the tendency of waves of differing frequency to move at different speeds, thus causing any localised wave to disperse in space over time) and *nonlinearity* (which can cause any concentrated portion of the wave to self-amplify). Solitons seem to lie at the exact balancing point between these two forces, neither dispersing nor amplifying, but instead simply traveling at a constant velocity or oscillating in phase at a constant rate. In some cases, this balancing point is unstable; remove even a tiny amount of mass from the soliton and it eventually disperses completely into radiation, or one can add a tiny amount and cause the soliton to concentrate into a point and thence exhibit blowup in finite time. In other cases, the balancing point is stable; small perturbations to a soliton may end up changing the amplitude, position, and/or velocity of the soliton slightly, but the bulk of the solution still closely resembles a soliton in size, shape, and behaviour. Stability is sometimes enforced by linear properties, such as dispersive estimates or spectral properties of the linearised dynamics, but is also often enforced by nonlinear properties, such as nonlinear conservation laws, monotonicity formulae, and local propagation estimates for mass and energy (such as those provided by virial identities). The interplay between all these properties can be remarkably subtle, especially in the *critical* case when a key conserved quantity is scale-invariant (thus leading to an additional degeneracy in the soliton manifold). This is particularly evident in the remarkable series of papers by Martel and Merle establishing various stability and blowup properties near the ground state soliton of the critical generalised KdV equation, which I spend some time discussing (without going into too many of the (quite numerous) technical details). The focus in my paper is primarily on the non-integrable case, in which the techniques are primarily analytic rather than algebraic or geometric.

## 14 comments

Comments feed for this article

19 February, 2008 at 11:44 am

This week in the arXivs… « It’s Equal, but It’s Different…[...] Why are solitons stable? [...]

19 February, 2008 at 3:45 pm

Tom WeidigHi,

You might be interested to know that there are also solitons that are stable due to their topology: topological solitons. Examples are the Sine-Gordon solitons, the 2D and 3D Skyrme solitons (Skyrmions), and the 3D Hopf solitons (Hopfions). All 2D and 3D models are non-integrable, and solutions can only be approximated or found by numerical minimization techniques of energy functionals like solving Euler-Lagrange equation or using simulated annealing. All these models are motivated by physics e.g. the 3D Skyrme as a model of the nucleus, and you get really beautiful pictures for the solitons with various topological charges, see for example:

http://www.kent.ac.uk/ims/personal/pms4/ri.html

And here is an introduction by myself, be warned it’s written by a physicist! :-)

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/9911/9911056v1.pdf

Best wishes,

Tom

19 February, 2008 at 4:58 pm

DavidHi Terence,

The equation directly above (2.1) on page 8 seems to be mislabeled as a first-order equation.

20 February, 2008 at 10:44 am

Terence TaoThanks for the corrections and comments!

20 February, 2008 at 5:50 pm

DavidDoes anyone have any guesses as to what happens when two solitons of similar speed and width collide?

I was also intrigued by your mention of ‘excited’ soliton states with changes in sign. Does there exist some kind of spectrum of soliton solutions?

21 February, 2008 at 2:04 am

Thomas RiepeExist analogs in char p or local fields of solitons and their mathematics?

21 February, 2008 at 2:17 am

Tom WeidigHi David,

well, I can tell you what happens with many topological solitons like 2D and 3D Skyrmions.

If they both have a positive topological charge, they scatter at a 90 degree angle: They first merge into an excited bound state and then the bound state splits into two. Though it depends at what speed they hit each other. If it is very slow, then they might stay in the bound state if it is energetically favorable. The same is true for 3D.

If they have exactly opposite topological charge, they merge and annihilate each other and create a lot of waves with zero topological charge.

The interesting thing is that 90 degree scattering and annihilation processes are typically quantum phenomena that these topological solitons exhibit, too. Some speculate that quantum mechanics is really just the fact that elementary particles are really solitons and neither waves nor particles. Though interesting, no-one has really written down a convincing and consistent theory. I should also mention that string theorists and quantum field theorists are also dealing with solitons.

Re 1D solitons, I think they mostly pass through each other.

Best wishes,

Tom

21 February, 2008 at 10:47 am

Terence TaoDear David,

For solitons in completely integrable models (e.g. KdV, 1D cubic NLS, sine-Gordon, …) what happens is that the solitons pass through each other, but they get shifted in location by the collision (though the velocity remains unchanged). For non-integrable models, the situation seems to be rather complicated; numerics suggest that one gets a wide range of behaviours ranging from integrable-type behaviour (possibly shedding a little bit of mass and energy as radiation) to total disruption into radiation. (Conceivably one can also get some sort of inelastic collision creating a single big soliton, though I don’t know if this has actually been observed numerically.)

Solitons can often be expressed as critical points of certain Lyapunov functionals (which typically are combinations of such conserved quantities as the mass and energy, the former of which can also be interpreted as a Lagrange multiplier). The ground state soliton tends to be the minimiser of such a functional, which tends to make it stable. But there are also excited states which correspond to non-minimising critical points. Typically there are a discrete set of these (modulo symmetries), and near each such soliton there are a finite number of unstable directions and a cofinite number of stable directions in which the dynamics can evolve. If one inserts a parameter into the nonlinearity and varies that parameter continuously, it is possible for some states to coalesce or branch; there are some interesting mathematical results analysing these sorts of things but I am not really an expert in these topics.

Dear Thomas,

That’s an interesting question; I don’t know of any really interesting analogues of nonlinear PDE phenomena in finite characteristic, though given how much algebraic structure there is in completely integrable systems such as KdV I would not be surprised if some version of complete integrability is meaningful in that setting. On the other hand, there are certainly discrete analogues of the KdV or NLS equations in which space (and sometimes time) is replaced with a discrete space such as , and then by restricting attention to spatially periodic solutions one can then study such evolutions on for various p. But in all such situations, the solutions remain complex-valued or real-valued, so it is not a true finite characteristic ps ituation.

26 February, 2008 at 7:24 am

Thomas RiepeDear Terence,

I just found some links mentioning such analogies of solitons:

http://noncommutativegeometry.blogspot.com/2007/02/physics-in-finite-characteristic.html

Drinfelds construction is explained here:

http://www.uni-math.gwdg.de/wiedmann/Diss_Englisch/master.pdf

a short notice:

http://www.ams.org/notices/200301/what-is.pdf

Unfortunately I found the article by Mumford “An algebrao-geometric construction…” mentioned there not online. Do you know where to find it on the web?

Best,

Thomas

13 February, 2009 at 12:44 pm

buffalo bizonDear Weidig,

Are these stable: Gravitational solitons and the squashed 7-sphere,

Classical Quantum Gravity 24 (2007), no. 18.

14 February, 2009 at 7:11 am

dr twotwoHi Weidig,

4th order KdV has a one-parameter family of solitons with radiating tails. How to choose the stable one?

16 February, 2009 at 12:23 am

howdy serfausHi Thomas,

I wonder why physicists name some patterns as soliton-stripes. Probably because interfaces are joined by smooth layers. If you are interested in patterns, some of them are complicated, e.g., Deformations of the gyroid and lidinoid minimal surfaces, Pacific J. Math. 235 (2008), no. 1.

16 February, 2009 at 7:30 am

rational gammaHi Thomas,

In char p no, in amonic groups yes.

17 February, 2009 at 12:50 pm

scoopeer mvngsndsHi Thomas,

Mumford’s forthcoming article is about sth else: apparently, Fitzhugh-Nagumo pulses have the symbol of a stable rhombic pattern, found recently (published in Phys. Rev. by some Koreans). Thus it is a minimizer of an unknown order variational thermodynamics functional, an extension of the Ginzburg-Landau one. I heard it will be presented in Canberra.