<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outliers in the spectrum of iid matrices with bounded rank perturbations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/</link>
	<description>Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics.  By Terence Tao</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matrix identities as derivatives of determinant identities &#171; What&#8217;s new</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-213090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matrix identities as derivatives of determinant identities &#171; What&#8217;s new]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-213090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for some . (This type of situation is also common in random matrix theory, for instance it arose in this previous paper of mine on outliers to the circular law.) If  is invertible, then from (1) and (2) one [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for some . (This type of situation is also common in random matrix theory, for instance it arose in this previous paper of mine on outliers to the circular law.) If  is invertible, then from (1) and (2) one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Char</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-168108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Char]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 01:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-168108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hi Terry, I have a question about the distribution of the outliers. According to Silverstein’s paper, outliers are N~(mu*n,sigma^2) given that the outliers are not normalised. I ran a simulation with R. I tried different values of n, mu, sigma and roughly 1000 matrices. I got the mean of the outliers of mu*n but I got the standard deviation approximately sigma*sqrt(2) instead of sigma. Is it a correct result?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry, I have a question about the distribution of the outliers. According to Silverstein’s paper, outliers are N~(mu*n,sigma^2) given that the outliers are not normalised. I ran a simulation with R. I tried different values of n, mu, sigma and roughly 1000 matrices. I got the mean of the outliers of mu*n but I got the standard deviation approximately sigma*sqrt(2) instead of sigma. Is it a correct result?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashar</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-51893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yashar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-51893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I found my own mistake: the Laurent series has infinite zeros actually...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I found my own mistake: the Laurent series has infinite zeros actually&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashar</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-51892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yashar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-51892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Terry, 

I have a question about the non-self-adjoint case that was studied by Rajan and Abbott. Simulations suggest that the total number of outlier eigenvalues (at least in the &quot;balanced&quot; case where the components of \psi_n sum up to 0) scales like \sqrt(n) (up to n ~ 3000). But you say above that the outlier point process converges to the zeros of that random Laurent series which is independent of n, suggesting that the  number of outliers is O(1), and not O(\sqrt(n)), and my simulations are not actually showing the very large n behavior.
Am I right (in concluding the number is O(1) based on what you say), or am I missing something? 
I would really appreciate your answer. 
Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry, </p>
<p>I have a question about the non-self-adjoint case that was studied by Rajan and Abbott. Simulations suggest that the total number of outlier eigenvalues (at least in the &#8220;balanced&#8221; case where the components of \psi_n sum up to 0) scales like \sqrt(n) (up to n ~ 3000). But you say above that the outlier point process converges to the zeros of that random Laurent series which is independent of n, suggesting that the  number of outliers is O(1), and not O(\sqrt(n)), and my simulations are not actually showing the very large n behavior.<br />
Am I right (in concluding the number is O(1) based on what you say), or am I missing something?<br />
I would really appreciate your answer.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrescaicedo</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-49644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andrescaicedo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-49644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Tao</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-49641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terence Tao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-49641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I discussed this identity at

http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/the-mesoscopic-structure-of-gue-eigenvalues/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discussed this identity at</p>
<p><a href="http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/the-mesoscopic-structure-of-gue-eigenvalues/" rel="nofollow">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/the-mesoscopic-structure-of-gue-eigenvalues/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrescaicedo</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-49637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andrescaicedo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-49637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry, didn&#039;t you have a post discussing identity (1)? Seems to have disappeared. (Maybe I&#039;m confused?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, didn&#8217;t you have a post discussing identity (1)? Seems to have disappeared. (Maybe I&#8217;m confused?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Tao</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-49380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terence Tao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 05:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-49380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reference!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reference!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Rao</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-49352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raj Rao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-49352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Or at least its analogue in the symmetric case)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Or at least its analogue in the symmetric case)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Rao</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/outliers-in-the-spectrum-of-iid-matrices-with-bounded-rank-permutations/#comment-49351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raj Rao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=4542#comment-49351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the paper:
Restricted rank modification of the symmetric eigenvalue problem: Theoretical considerations  by Arbenz, Gander, Golub

the formula in your Remark 2.2 is referred to as the &quot;modified Weinstein determinant&quot;  following Weinstein and Stenger&#039;s &quot;Methods for Intermediate Problems for Eigenvalues&quot;.

Just FYI :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the paper:<br />
Restricted rank modification of the symmetric eigenvalue problem: Theoretical considerations  by Arbenz, Gander, Golub</p>
<p>the formula in your Remark 2.2 is referred to as the &#8220;modified Weinstein determinant&#8221;  following Weinstein and Stenger&#8217;s &#8220;Methods for Intermediate Problems for Eigenvalues&#8221;.</p>
<p>Just FYI :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
