<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 254A, Notes 7: Models of ultra approximate groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/</link>
	<description>Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics.  By Terence Tao</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:32:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou van den Dries</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-127276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou van den Dries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-127276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The  ``less than&quot;  sign in (2) in the proof of Sanders&#039; lemma should be a
&quot;greater than&quot; sign, I think.

&lt;i&gt;[Corrected, thanks - T.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  &#8220;less than&#8221;  sign in (2) in the proof of Sanders&#8217; lemma should be a<br />
&#8220;greater than&#8221; sign, I think.</p>
<p><i>[Corrected, thanks - T.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou van den Dries</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-127275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou van den Dries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-127275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some typos in the proof of Sanders&#039; Lemma:
. Two displays later,  (1/m)&#124;A^2&#124; should be
(1/m)&#124;A&#039;A&#124;, and the right hand sides in the next  two displays should be
(1-(1/m)) &#124;A&#039;A&#124; and (1-(1/m))f(t)&#124;A&#124;.  In the subsequent two displays
the right hand side is missing a factor &#124;A&#124;.

&lt;i&gt;[Corrected, thanks - T.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some typos in the proof of Sanders&#8217; Lemma:<br />
. Two displays later,  (1/m)|A^2| should be<br />
(1/m)|A&#8217;A|, and the right hand sides in the next  two displays should be<br />
(1-(1/m)) |A&#8217;A| and (1-(1/m))f(t)|A|.  In the subsequent two displays<br />
the right hand side is missing a factor |A|.</p>
<p><i>[Corrected, thanks - T.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Tao</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-110917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terence Tao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-110917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the corrections!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the corrections!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Cook</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-110904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-110904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some small typos: in Lemma 10 do you want $latex \delta_1, \delta_2$ as in the proof? 

Exercise 29 - $latex N$ should be $latex n$ in the definition of $latex A_n$.

Exercise 31, part (iii) - I think should be project to one of the two factors $latex G_0$, rather than two factors of $latex G_0$.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some small typos: in Lemma 10 do you want <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cdelta_1%2C+%5Cdelta_2&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='&#92;delta_1, &#92;delta_2' title='&#92;delta_1, &#92;delta_2' class='latex' /> as in the proof? </p>
<p>Exercise 29 &#8211; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=N&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='N' title='N' class='latex' /> should be <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=n&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='n' title='n' class='latex' /> in the definition of <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=A_n&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='A_n' title='A_n' class='latex' />.</p>
<p>Exercise 31, part (iii) &#8211; I think should be project to one of the two factors <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G_0&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='G_0' title='G_0' class='latex' />, rather than two factors of <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G_0&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='G_0' title='G_0' class='latex' />.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Cook</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-110902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-110902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the proof of the Normal Sanders Lemma, doesn&#039;t application of the Rusza covering lemma give that $latex A$ is covered by $latex O_{K,m}(1)$ left translates of $latex S^2$, not $latex S$? Everything still works if we take $latex S$ such that $latex S^{8m}$ is contained in $latex A^4$ at the start - I just want to check my understanding that the Rusza covering lemma converts statements like $latex &#124;S&#124;\gg_{K,m}&#124;A&#124;$ to statements about $latex A$ being covered by translates of $latex S^2$ rather than $latex S$.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the proof of the Normal Sanders Lemma, doesn&#8217;t application of the Rusza covering lemma give that <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=A&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='A' title='A' class='latex' /> is covered by <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=O_%7BK%2Cm%7D%281%29&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='O_{K,m}(1)' title='O_{K,m}(1)' class='latex' /> left translates of <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E2&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='S^2' title='S^2' class='latex' />, not <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='S' title='S' class='latex' />? Everything still works if we take <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='S' title='S' class='latex' /> such that <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E%7B8m%7D&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='S^{8m}' title='S^{8m}' class='latex' /> is contained in <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=A%5E4&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='A^4' title='A^4' class='latex' /> at the start &#8211; I just want to check my understanding that the Rusza covering lemma converts statements like <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7CS%7C%5Cgg_%7BK%2Cm%7D%7CA%7C&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='|S|&#92;gg_{K,m}|A|' title='|S|&#92;gg_{K,m}|A|' class='latex' /> to statements about <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=A&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='A' title='A' class='latex' /> being covered by translates of <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E2&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='S^2' title='S^2' class='latex' /> rather than <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='S' title='S' class='latex' />.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Tao</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-105410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terence Tao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-105410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, there were several things wrong with that exercise; I&#039;ve had to rewrite it a bit to address the issues you found.  Hopefully it is now ok...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, there were several things wrong with that exercise; I&#8217;ve had to rewrite it a bit to address the issues you found.  Hopefully it is now ok&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hayes</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-105360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Hayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-105360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Exercise 31 should there be a $latex -n$ somewhere? I think, e.g. you may want $latex A_{n}=\{(i,x):i\in \{-1,0,1\},x\in ({\bf Z}/2{\bf Z})^{\{-n,\cdots,n\}}$ I&#039;m having difficulty showing that $latex A$ contains the inverse image of an open neighborhood of the identity in $latex G\times_{\mathbf{Z}}G.$]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Exercise 31 should there be a <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=-n&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='-n' title='-n' class='latex' /> somewhere? I think, e.g. you may want <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=A_%7Bn%7D%3D%5C%7B%28i%2Cx%29%3Ai%5Cin+%5C%7B-1%2C0%2C1%5C%7D%2Cx%5Cin+%28%7B%5Cbf+Z%7D%2F2%7B%5Cbf+Z%7D%29%5E%7B%5C%7B-n%2C%5Ccdots%2Cn%5C%7D%7D&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='A_{n}=&#92;{(i,x):i&#92;in &#92;{-1,0,1&#92;},x&#92;in ({&#92;bf Z}/2{&#92;bf Z})^{&#92;{-n,&#92;cdots,n&#92;}}' title='A_{n}=&#92;{(i,x):i&#92;in &#92;{-1,0,1&#92;},x&#92;in ({&#92;bf Z}/2{&#92;bf Z})^{&#92;{-n,&#92;cdots,n&#92;}}' class='latex' /> I&#8217;m having difficulty showing that <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=A&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='A' title='A' class='latex' /> contains the inverse image of an open neighborhood of the identity in <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G%5Ctimes_%7B%5Cmathbf%7BZ%7D%7DG.&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='G&#92;times_{&#92;mathbf{Z}}G.' title='G&#92;times_{&#92;mathbf{Z}}G.' class='latex' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hayes</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-104988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Hayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-104988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the $latex m$ in the displayed equation on part (iv) of Exercise 23 be a displayed $latex -m?$ Otherwise this part doesn&#039;t seem as helpful.

&lt;i&gt;[Oops, corrected, thanks - T.]&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=m&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='m' title='m' class='latex' /> in the displayed equation on part (iv) of Exercise 23 be a displayed <img src='http://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=-m%3F&amp;bg=ffffff&amp;fg=545454&amp;s=0' alt='-m?' title='-m?' class='latex' /> Otherwise this part doesn&#8217;t seem as helpful.</p>
<p><i>[Oops, corrected, thanks - T.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 254A, Notes 9: Applications of the structural theory of approximate groups &#171; What&#8217;s new</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-104883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[254A, Notes 9: Applications of the structural theory of approximate groups &#171; What&#8217;s new]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-104883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] but we will give here an alternate argument relying on a version of the Croot-Sisask lemma used in Notes 7 which is a little weaker with regards to quantitative bounds, but is slightly simpler technically [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but we will give here an alternate argument relying on a version of the Croot-Sisask lemma used in Notes 7 which is a little weaker with regards to quantitative bounds, but is slightly simpler technically [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 254A, Notes 8: The microstructure of approximate groups &#171; What&#8217;s new</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/254a-notes-7-models-of-ultra-approximate-groups/#comment-101198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[254A, Notes 8: The microstructure of approximate groups &#171; What&#8217;s new]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=5413#comment-101198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] macroscopic structure of these objects is well described by the Hrushovski Lie model theorem from the previous set of notes, which informally asserts that the macroscopic structure of an (ultra) approximate group can be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] macroscopic structure of these objects is well described by the Hrushovski Lie model theorem from the previous set of notes, which informally asserts that the macroscopic structure of an (ultra) approximate group can be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
