Comments on: Spending symmetry

By: GARRY HERRINGTON

GARRY HERRINGTON — Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:37:53 +0000

Thanks Terrence. I enjoy reading your blog and its great to have some posts saved in a convenient form.

Regards, Garry __________________________________

By: windfarmmusic

windfarmmusic — Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:17:36 +0000

Never mind – it rendered wrong for me for some reason..

By: windfarmmusic

windfarmmusic — Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:16:44 +0000

Loving re-reading the long blue-eyed islanders post! Possible typo: Is there a minus sign missing on , around “…From the perspective
of , it is possible that one is in the world , in which does not
have blue eyes…” ?

By: Arnaud

Arnaud — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:49:52 +0000

Page 47 Line 10 , “thus ” should be “thus ”

[Thanks, this will be corrected in the next revision of the ms - T.]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:10:21 +0000

Looks nice. The first chapter “argument from ignorance” describes some inferences that I think are called “abductive reasoning“; there is a good Wikipedia article with that title. I tried to hyperlink it but I don’t know if that will work.

By: pgiacome

pgiacome — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:42:10 +0000

your productivity in terms of papers and book is sometimes scaring

By: h

Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:38:56 +0000

May I suggest using hyperlinks for url’s in the pdf file?

[Good suggestion; this will be done in the next revision of the ms - T.]

By: Ju’x

Ju’x — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:32:49 +0000

Page 95, line 3 : “similar, actually, to the approach taken in I took to the nullstellensatz in” should be rewritten.

[Thanks, this will be done in the next revision of the ms - T.]

By: Spending symmetry « Guzman's Mathematics Weblog

Spending symmetry « Guzman's Mathematics Weblog — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:31:13 +0000

[...] Spending symmetry. [...]