*[Corrected, thanks - T.]*

http://terrytao.wordpress.com/advice-on-writing-papers/maximising-the-results-to-effort-ratio/

http://terrytao.wordpress.com/advice-on-writing-papers/implicit-notational-conventions/

http://terrytao.wordpress.com/advice-on-writing-papers/on-the-strength-of-theorems/

]]>Thank you very much for all the great advice! Unfortunately, since Google Buzz closed down, the following links are broken:

“The ratio between results and effort in one’s paper should be at a local maximum.”

“On the use of implicit mathematical notational conventions to provide contextual clues when reading.”

and

“On key “jumps in difficulty” in a mathematical argument, and how finding and understanding them is often key to understanding the argument as a whole.”

I would really appreciate it if you would reprint these articles.

Thank you in advance!

]]>difference $ X-P_ {i} $

and taking into account the

$ \ beta (x) = O \ left (\ frac {x} {\ ln ^ M x} \ right) $ – even among those who can not be branded

as the sum of two prime numbers, it follows that one of the differences

$ X-P_ {i} = P_ {k} + P_ {j} $,

$ X = P_ {i} + P_ {k} + P_ {j} $.

We chose $ x $ and got Vinogradov theorem …

To answer this Tao?:

]]>require Endorsement needed for math.NT, you would not have helped me?

Я доказал Гипотезу Лежандра , хотел послать в arxiv.org, но там

требуют Endorsement needed for math.NT, Вы бы мне не помогли ?