<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spending symmetry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrytao.wordpress.com/books/spending-symmetry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics.  By Terence Tao</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A mathematical formalisation of dimensional analysis &#171; What&#8217;s new</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/books/spending-symmetry/#comment-211406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A mathematical formalisation of dimensional analysis &#171; What&#8217;s new]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?page_id=6307#comment-211406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We have already observed that to verify a dimensionally consistent statement between dimensionful quantities, it suffices to do so for a single choice of the dimension parameters ; one can view this as being analogous to the transfer principle in nonstandard analysis, relating dimensionful mathematics with dimensionless mathematics. Thus, for instance, if  have the units of , , and  respectively, then to verify the dimensionally consistent identity , it suffices to do so for a single choice of units . For instance, one can choose a set of units (such as Planck units) for which the speed of light  becomes , in which case the dimensionally consistent identity  simplifies to the dimensionally inconsistent identity . Note that once we sacrifice dimensional consistency, though, we cannot then transfer back to the dimensionful setting; the identity  does not hold for all choices of units, only the special choice of units for which . So we see a tradeoff between the freedom to vary units, and the freedom to work with dimensionally inconsistent equations; one can spend one freedom for another, but one cannot have both at the same time. (This is closely related to the concept of spending symmetry, which I discuss for instance in this post (or in Section 2.1 of this book).) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have already observed that to verify a dimensionally consistent statement between dimensionful quantities, it suffices to do so for a single choice of the dimension parameters ; one can view this as being analogous to the transfer principle in nonstandard analysis, relating dimensionful mathematics with dimensionless mathematics. Thus, for instance, if  have the units of , , and  respectively, then to verify the dimensionally consistent identity , it suffices to do so for a single choice of units . For instance, one can choose a set of units (such as Planck units) for which the speed of light  becomes , in which case the dimensionally consistent identity  simplifies to the dimensionally inconsistent identity . Note that once we sacrifice dimensional consistency, though, we cannot then transfer back to the dimensionful setting; the identity  does not hold for all choices of units, only the special choice of units for which . So we see a tradeoff between the freedom to vary units, and the freedom to work with dimensionally inconsistent equations; one can spend one freedom for another, but one cannot have both at the same time. (This is closely related to the concept of spending symmetry, which I discuss for instance in this post (or in Section 2.1 of this book).) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arminniakan</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/books/spending-symmetry/#comment-200750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arminniakan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?page_id=6307#comment-200750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wish even more success for you, Professor.
I cannot wait to come to the deparment to study and hopefully become your student Someday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish even more success for you, Professor.<br />
I cannot wait to come to the deparment to study and hopefully become your student Someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spending symmetry &#171; What&#8217;s new</title>
		<link>http://terrytao.wordpress.com/books/spending-symmetry/#comment-193914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spending symmetry &#171; What&#8217;s new]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?page_id=6307#comment-193914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my 2011 blog posts (and also my Google buzzes and Google+ posts from that year), entitled &#8220;Spending symmetry&#8220;.    The PDF of this draft is available here.  This is again a rather  assorted (and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my 2011 blog posts (and also my Google buzzes and Google+ posts from that year), entitled &#8220;Spending symmetry&#8220;.    The PDF of this draft is available here.  This is again a rather  assorted (and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
