Chaque vérité que je trouvois étant une règle qui me servoit après à en trouver d’autres [Each truth that I discovered became a rule which then served to discover other truths].(René Descartes, “Discours de la Méthode“)

Problem solving, from homework problems to unsolved problems, is certainly an important aspect of mathematics, though definitely not the only one. Later in your research career, you will find that problems are mainly solved by knowledge (of your own field and of other fields), experience, patience and hard work; but for the type of problems one sees in school, college or in mathematics competitions one needs a slightly different set of problem solving skills. I do have a book on how to solve mathematical problems at this level; in particular, the first chapter discusses general problem-solving strategies. There are of course several other problem-solving books, such as Polya’s classic “How to solve it“, which I myself learnt from while competing at the Mathematics Olympiads.

Solving homework problems is an essential component of *really* learning a mathematical subject – it shows that you can “walk the walk” and not just “talk the talk”, and in particular identifies any specific weaknesses you have with the material. It’s worth persisting in trying to understand how to do these problems, and not just for the immediate goal of getting a good grade; if you have a difficulty with the homework which is not resolved, it is likely to cause you further difficulties later in the course, or in subsequent courses.

I find that “playing” with a problem, even after you have solved it, is very helpful for understanding the underlying mechanism of the solution better. For instance, one can try removing some hypotheses, or trying to prove a stronger conclusion. See “ask yourself dumb questions“.

It’s also best to keep in mind that obtaining a solution is only the short-term goal of solving a mathematical problem. The long-term goal is to increase your understanding of a subject. A good rule of thumb is that if you cannot adequately explain the solution of a problem to a classmate, then you haven’t really understood the solution yourself, and you may need to think about the problem more (for instance, by covering up the solution and trying it again). For related reasons, one should value partial progress on a problem as being a stepping stone to a complete solution (and also as an important way to deepen one’s understanding of the subject).

See also Eric Schechter’s “Common errors in undergraduate mathematics“. I also have a post on problem solving strategies in real analysis.

## 21 comments

Comments feed for this article

29 October, 2008 at 3:31 am

fnasimDear Terry

I am Farhan Nasim from Bangladesh. Thanks for your advice on

Solving mathematical problems.I have solved a STEP problem. The solution is here. Please make a comment on the solution.

Note: My English is quite poor, you may experience this in the solution.

31 December, 2008 at 6:43 am

AnonymousHi,

Not to be rude, but a translation of Descartes that captures the original poetry of his phrase better might be:

Each truth I discovered was a rule that then served to discover other truths.

[Corrected, thanks - T.]1 January, 2009 at 3:46 pm

thomasteepeDear Professor Tao,

here are two articles on the benefits of clever note-taking for math problem solving:

http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Resources/AoPS_R_A_Mistakes.php

with a strong emphasis on math competitions

and

http://www.scribd.com/doc/952780/Mind-Maps-and-Math-Problem-Solving

with a number of ideas on how to use mind maps in math.

Best regards,

Thomas

25 January, 2011 at 2:19 pm

thomasteepeI’ve outlined some more ideas math problem solving:

The 8 page paper contains a problem solving layout I find very useful personally (and indeed m u c h better than the previous mind map approach), and a densely packed one-page collection of essential problem solving tools.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46092496/Some-Practical-Remarks-on-Solving-Math-Problems

18 January, 2009 at 4:14 am

fnasimHi Thomas

Thanks for your useful links. Would you mind reviewing a problem solved by me. Please go here.

Best Regards

F Nasim

12 March, 2009 at 8:04 pm

analgeomaticaHi dear Professor Tao,

I am very interested in elementary geometry and higher dimension Euclidean geometry, could you please upload chapter 4 in your problem book (I see it is about geometry), thank you very much.

I hope you are interested in elementary geometry, too, nice to meet you here!

Best regards,

Tran Quang Hung.

23 March, 2009 at 4:10 am

UndergradHi Prof Tao,

As an undergraduate student I often face the problem of deciding how many textbooks problems I should do before moving on, for example, Is ten questions per chapter of Rudin’s Principles of Math Analysis adequate? The more problems I do on a specific topic the slower it takes to reach graduate level mathematics. On the other hand, if I just do the homework problems I feel I won’t be fast enough for answering questions during exams.

Is there any way of deciding this question?

many many thanks

23 March, 2009 at 9:52 am

DajHi Professor Tao,

http://www.mathlinks.ro/viewtopic.php?t=266042

12 October, 2010 at 8:09 am

Depression and problem solving in mathematics: the art of staying upbeat « Republic of Mathematics[...] attitude to problem solving and to mathematics in general. Terry wrote a helpful blog post “Solving mathematical problems“. He recommends playing with a [...]

8 January, 2011 at 9:43 pm

hezhigangDear Prof. Tao:

I hava translated this essay into chinese, I’m sorry I couldn’t translated it well enough, as my ability in english is as poor as mathematics. Your blog is Gospel to those who are interested in Professional mathematics.

译文url: http://article.yeeyan.org/view/99083/121600

2 March, 2011 at 7:44 pm

LeifMy name is Leif and I wanted to ask you on your opinion on something-forgive me if this seems strange or random. As someone who has apparently fit the profile of “child prodigy” and “genius” (e.g. the fact that you graduated high school and university and earned your doctorate so young), I’m wondering if you think you possess something that only a few others have in terms of intellectual ability or not. I have always believed that if someone applies himself and puts in enough time, effort, concentration, and perseverance they can accomplish whatever they set their mind to. And I greatly appreciated the article on your page where you say that someone does NOT have to be a genius to be a mathematician. Does that mean you don’t consider yourself a genius or you don’t really see a distinction between yourself and others who apply themselves and are ambitious? I am not saying I don’t believe some people are naturally more gifted at certain things or develop stronger skills or have stronger talents than others. I just think it’s possible to achieve levels of excellence and brilliance even in your weak areas through consistent practice. That’s why I disagree with this post by astronomer Julianne Dalcanton http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/ which i found linked from your page where she doesn’t believe most people can reach the level of Feynman-Einstein-Hawking smart. I’m wondering why not? With enough time and effort. After all, they made their share of mistakes and setbacks but did not give up and they were not superhuman or genetically enhanced as far as I know.. And isn’t part of their fame due to circumstance and perhaps even chance-not their intellectual ability but I mean their status and the fact that their discoveries happened to be earth-shattering or were given more attention by the public at-large beyond the scientific community? Surely some of the scientists working today will make equally groundbreaking or insightful discoveries or develop innovative theories and thus can fairly be labeled “genius” or as having the same level of smarts?.

I think I have developed a stronger aptitude for language than for math and due to suffering from depression in high school and middle school I didn’t push myself nearly as much as I could and lost much of my motivation. However, I don’t see why it’s not possible for me to develop mathematical abilities as strong as my linguistic abilities or even pursue a career in astronomy (which I love) or physics or even pure mathematics. And I know you say similar things on your career advice blog, and I know it’s important to be realistic and plan for graduate school and beyond I just really don’t like how people put this label of genius or prodigy on certain people to (in my opinion) make them seem able to achieve things that most other people cannot–even the levels of Einstein or Mozart. And I don’t think that’s arrogant or unrealistic..but I wanted to get your honest opinion. Thanks in advance for your time.

15 March, 2011 at 7:35 pm

AmateurHey Leif,

This book might be useful in pursuing the answer for your question:

http://www.amazon.com/Talent-Overrated-Separates-World-Class-Performers/dp/1591842247

Disclaimer: I just read the summary and reviews of that book. I plan to read it and a few related books later. I’m, at the moment, too busy with studying Maths stuff.

11 April, 2011 at 3:20 pm

AnonymousThanks Amateur for the link I appreciate that you replied to me since Mr. Tao still hasn’t..

23 April, 2011 at 3:01 am

OneminusDear Prof. Tao,

I am a high school student,I loved math got good grades in my middle school years.But I find math hard and i often make many mistakes now.In fact ,i think i can work out many problems while doing my homework .But i am very nervous during my math exams and i almost forget everything i have learnt.

Now i still love math but i am afraid of exams.What should i do?

3 June, 2011 at 8:11 am

How to Solve It and some proposed analogies for problem-solving « Boundless Rationality[...] Terence Tao’s take on problem-solving [...]

27 September, 2011 at 9:21 pm

Sabysachi MukherjeeDear Professor Tao,

I am a fifteen year old student currently in high school.I am currently self-studying some non-rigorous calculus. (I have 2 more years in high school).

I am curious to know what I should study next.Should I study some analysis or is it group theory that you recommend?I am confused.

30 October, 2011 at 10:46 am

AnonymousWell, after calculus, one usually studies multivariable calculus. Try http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-01sc-single-variable-calculus-fall-2010/ to see if you’ve learned everything in regular calculus, and then go onto http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/ .

24 December, 2011 at 7:27 pm

Learning Chinese « tummykung[...] original: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/solving-mathematical-problems/ [...]

11 December, 2013 at 5:23 pm

Tomas KojarThe link for the book doesn’t work.

[Fixed, thanks - T.]2 February, 2014 at 1:17 pm

AnonymousOn a somewhat unrelated note: do you engage in light to moderate physical activity in order to concentrate over extended periods of time?

16 April, 2014 at 4:15 am

palaki want more and more suggetions