I’ve just uploaded to the arXiv my paper “A global compact attractor for high-dimensional defocusing non-linear Schrödinger equations with potential“, submitted to Dynamics of PDE. This paper continues some earlier work of myself in an attempt to understand the *soliton resolution conjecture* for various nonlinear dispersive equations, and in particular, nonlinear Schrödinger equations (NLS). This conjecture (which I also discussed in my third Simons lecture) asserts, roughly speaking, that any reasonable (e.g. bounded energy) solution to such equations eventually resolves into a superposition of a radiation component (which behaves like a solution to the linear Schrödinger equation) plus a finite number of “nonlinear bound states” or “solitons”. This conjecture is known in many perturbative cases (when the solution is close to a special solution, such as the vacuum state or a ground state) as well as in defocusing cases (in which no non-trivial bound states or solitons exist), but is still almost completely open in non-perturbative situations (in which the solution is large and not close to a special solution) which contain at least one bound state. In my earlier papers, I was able to show that for certain NLS models in sufficiently high dimension, one could at least say that such solutions resolved into a radiation term plus a finite number of “weakly bound” states whose evolution was essentially almost periodic (or almost periodic modulo translation symmetries). These bound states also enjoyed various additional decay and regularity properties. As a consequence of this, in five and higher dimensions (and for reasonable nonlinearities), and assuming spherical symmetry, I showed that there was a (local) *compact attractor* for the flow: any solution with energy bounded by some given level E would eventually decouple into a radiation term, plus a state which converged to this compact attractor . In that result, I did not rule out the possibility that this attractor depended on the energy E. Indeed, it is conceivable for many models that there exist nonlinear bound states of arbitrarily high energy, which would mean that must increase in size as E increases to accommodate these states. (I discuss these results in a recent talk of mine.)

In my new paper, following a suggestion of Michael Weinstein, I consider the NLS equation

where is the solution, and is a smooth compactly supported real potential. We make the standard assumption (which is asserting that the nonlinearity is mass-supercritical and energy-subcritical). In the absence of this potential (i.e. when V=0), this is the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, which is known to have no bound states, and in fact it is known in this case that all finite energy solutions eventually *scatter* into a radiation state (which asymptotically resembles a solution to the linear Schrödinger equation). However, once one adds a potential (particularly one which is large and negative), both *linear *bound states (solutions to the linear eigenstate equation ) and *nonlinear* bound states (solutions to the nonlinear eigenstate equation ) can appear. Thus in this case the soliton resolution conjecture predicts that solutions should resolve into a scattering state (that behaves as if the potential was not present), plus a finite number of (nonlinear) bound states. There is a fair amount of work towards this conjecture for this model in perturbative cases (when the energy is small), but the case of large energy solutions is still open.

In my new paper, I consider the large energy case, assuming spherical symmetry. For technical reasons, I also need to assume very high dimension . The main result is the existence of a *global* compact attractor K: every finite energy solution, no matter how large, eventually resolves into a scattering state and a state which converges to K. In particular, since K is bounded, all but a bounded amount of energy will be radiated off to infinity. Another corollary of this result is that the space of all nonlinear bound states for this model is compact. Intuitively, the point is that when the solution gets very large, the defocusing nonlinearity dominates any attractive aspects of the potential V, and so the solution will disperse in this case; thus one expects the only bound states to be bounded. The spherical symmetry assumption also restricts the bound states to lie near the origin, thus yielding the compactness. (It is also conceivable that the localised nature of V also restricts bound states to lie near the origin, even without the help of spherical symmetry, but I was not able to establish this rigorously.)

In view of my previous results concerning local compact attractors, the main difficulty is to show that spherically symmetric *almost periodic* solutions – solutions which range inside a compact subset of the energy space – enjoy a universal upper bound on their energy and mass. (This can be viewed as a “quasi-Liouville theorem”, in analogy with other recent Liouville theorems in the literature which classify various types of almost periodic solutions.)

This is accomplished in two stages. Firstly, by extensive use of the Duhamel formula and the dispersive properties of the free Schrödinger propagator (as in my previous papers), one shows that spherically symmetric almost periodic solutions exhibit quite strong decay away from the origin (more than is predicted just from the finite energy hypothesis); indeed, they decay like the Newton potential (which makes sense, if one looks at the bound state equation). In high dimension, this gives additional moment bounds on the solution. For instance, in 11 and higher dimensions, it implies that not only do almost periodic solutions have finite mass (which means that is finite) but that the sixth moment is also finite.

These moment conditions allow one to use some exotic virial identities. The basic virial identity for NLS is given by the formula

where is a weight function which has to obey some reasonable regularity and growth hypotheses but is otherwise arbitrary. The more moment conditions one has on u, the more rapid one can take the growth of a to be.

Different choices of the weight a yield different interesting consequences. For instance, gives the momentum conservation law, while gives the Morawetz inequalities. The choice gives the virial identity of Glassey, which I use to establish a universal bound on the energy. It turns out that the choice gives an identity that can give a universal bound on the mass (coming from the term in the identity), which yields the main theorem; the dimension hypothesis is needed to get enough decay on the almost periodic solution in order to justify the formal application of the virial identity with this quartic weight. (By working a bit harder I was able to weaken this hypothesis to , but the correct hypothesis should be , in analogy with the classical theory of resonances for the linear Schrödinger operator with potential.)

One technical feature that comes up when dealing with superquadratic weights such as is that the mass term that involves is negative, which looks unfavourable. Fortunately, it turns out that one can use Hardy’s inequality and the term coming from the Hessian to convert this negative term into a positive one.

There is an amusing consequence of these results; once one has a global compact attractor for a PDE, it becomes possible *in principle* to establish soliton resolution for this PDE by a finite amount of rigorous numerics on that attractor (or on some larger compact set containing that attractor), combined with some quantitative nonlinear stability results on all the soliton states. However such a program would be extremely complicated to execute in practice.

## 1 comment

Comments feed for this article

13 May, 2008 at 2:03 pm

carlbrannenThis is an excellent idea. I did something similar, see section IV with Clifford / Geometric algebra (GA) a few years ago. The result was that a non linear Dirac equation can be rewritten as a set of stuff that moves according to the usual linear Dirac equation and a set of interactions.

A reason for starting with the Geometric Algebra (sometimes called “spacetime algebra” or “STA” by David Hestenes and followers) is that it makes Lorentz symmetry automatic. At the time I was working on 4+1 spacetime so it is only 5 dimensional. The GA on 3+1 dimensions is known to the physicists as the Dirac algebra and consists of the gamma matrices used to model spin-1/2 particles like the electron, neutrino or proton.

Another reason for using GA (or Clifford algebra) is that it gives you more dimensions per spacetime dimension, but my motivation at the time was to get the structure of the weak hypercharge and weak isospin quantum numbers.