“As is known to be dense in “.

I can’t find this result in the previous notes. Would you elaborate?

(As I go through the 245ABC series of notes, I find that results used are not necessarily in a strictly logical order, which is emphasized strongly in your two volumes of Analysis books. Is it intentional?)

]]>For example, the Tietze-Urysohn theorem can be proved with this condition for and . There are also non-linear versions for complete metric spaces of this principle (Schauder lemma).

]]>2) In the proof of Corollary, it is “Theorem 2” instead of “Theorem 1”.

3) In Corollary 1, a “Tx” is not in mathematical mode.

*[Corrected, thanks. I do not see a quick way to recover the implication of 1 from 3, so it is probably best to just delete the remark. -T.]*

*[Corrected, thanks – T.]*

What is the Hahn-Banach Theorem used for in Exercise 6?

*[It is not used, and the reference to it has been removed – T.] *

*[ here should have been – T.]*