Comments on: Benford’s law, Zipf’s law, and the Pareto distribution
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/
Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence TaoMon, 21 May 2018 20:43:45 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: When the Average is a Poor Metric for Measuring Application Performance | Loggly
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-481263
Fri, 26 May 2017 20:24:40 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-481263[…] Tao, Terence. “Benford’s Law, Zipf’s Law, and the Pareto Distribution.” 3 July 2009. […]
]]>By: Dynamics on emerging spaces: modeling the emergence of novelties | the morning paper
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-477491
Fri, 03 Feb 2017 06:00:10 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-477491[…] dataset should follow four conditions for the law to […]
]]>By: Zipf’s law, Power-law distributions in “The Anatomy of Melancholy”. Part I | Buridan's Ass
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-468775
Thu, 19 May 2016 07:29:40 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-468775[…] law and it’s sister laws: Benford’s law and the Pareto distribution. (Terry tao has a nice post describing all three and how they relate to each […]
]]>By: zawy (@loganspappy)
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-468734
Wed, 18 May 2016 13:22:48 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-468734Benford’s law also holds better for language than Madelbrot’s modification to Zipf’s law 1/(r+2.7). Use ~2.2 times Benford’s law, and divide both by ln(1.78*unique words in language).
]]>By: Наша статистика ок | minimumlikelihood
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-467773
Sun, 17 Apr 2016 00:15:13 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-467773[…] […]
]]>By: 2 – Benford’s law, Zipf’s law, and the Pareto distribution (2009)
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-465046
Sat, 09 Jan 2016 23:17:41 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-465046[…] Read more here: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/ […]
]]>By: Joe
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-463400
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:44:30 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-463400Professor Tao, I am a novice here, so I am not sure if this is totally trivial, but if X follows Zipf’s law, does any monotonic transformation of X also follow Zipf’s law? What about Pareto? Thanks.
]]>By: jeffdelezen
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-456935
Sun, 05 Jul 2015 01:32:23 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-456935Reblogged this on Siamese Submarine.
]]>By: A reddit visualization | Done Is Better Than Perfect
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-456492
Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:24:09 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-456492[…] is. It’s reasonable to expect the subreddits population to follow a pareto distribution (see this post by Terence Tao for a definition of “reasonable”). The simplest way to check is to see if the […]
]]>By: john
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/benfords-law-zipfs-law-and-the-pareto-distribution/#comment-452521
Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:11:16 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=2305#comment-452521sorry, did not mean to put it here as an answer to Kevin O’Bryant comment, done by mistake.
]]>