My graduate text on measure theory (based on these lecture notes) is now published by the AMS as part of the Graduate Studies in Mathematics series. (See also my own blog page for this book, which among other things contains a draft copy of the book in PDF format.)
Recent Comments
Google+ feed
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
The Polymath Blog
- Two polymath (of a sort) proposed projects 20 January, 2014
- Polymath9: P=NP? (The Discretized Borel Determinacy Approach) 4 November, 2013
- Polymath8 – A Success ! 20 September, 2013
- Polymath7 research thread 5: the hot spots conjecture 9 August, 2013
- Polymath proposal: bounded gaps between primes 4 June, 2013
- Polymath proposal (Tim Gowers): Randomized Parallel Sorting Algorithm 2 March, 2013
- Next Polymath Project(s): What, When, Where? 14 February, 2013
- Polymath7 research threads 4: the Hot Spots Conjecture 10 September, 2012
- Minipolymath4 project, second research thread 13 July, 2012
- Minipolymath4 project: IMO 2012 Q3 12 July, 2012
Mathematics in Australia
- Save pure mathematics at the VU University of Amsterdam 30 April, 2011
- ERA results for mathematical sciences in Australia 15 February, 2011
- Junior positions at ANU 8 November, 2010
- AustMS now on twitter 10 October, 2010
- Research not bad, but not stellar 9 May, 2010
- L’Oréal Australia For Women In Science Fellowships 11 April, 2010
- Postdoctoral position (Level A) in mathematics at Australian National University 18 January, 2010
- Cheryl Praeger named as 2009 Western Australian Scientist of the Year 2 December, 2009
- Positions at Australian National University 4 November, 2009
- Mathematics skills out for the count 26 October, 2009
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
25 September, 2011 at 6:02 am
Anony.
First is Radamacher, but then Rademacher. Best
[I was unable to locate this typo. Could you provide a page number please? Thanks – T.]
4 October, 2011 at 7:05 am
S.V.
Page 228 – Rademacher (2x)
(btw I am not the Anony that posted the previous message.)
[Ah, got it. It turns out that this error was already corrected in the published version, which is why I couldn’t find it. -T.]
21 April, 2012 at 12:16 am
Daniel Barter
Hi Terry,
I am not sure if this has been fixed in the actual book, but exercise 1.6.13 in the draft is not true. I think it should ask you to prove that the inequality in exercise 1.6.12 is an equality.
[Thanks for the correction – T.]