Comments on: A partial converse to Bezout’s theorem
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/a-partial-converse-to-bezouts-theorem/
Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence TaoSun, 30 Sep 2012 23:43:02 +0000
hourly
1 http://wordpress.com/
By: domotorp
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/a-partial-converse-to-bezouts-theorem/#comment-176828
Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:11:23 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=6176#comment-176828In (1) of theorem 2 there is a typo – it it should be Pi(x,y)=Qi(x,y)=0.

[Corrected, thanks – T.]

]]>
By: Jackson
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/a-partial-converse-to-bezouts-theorem/#comment-176713
Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:18:21 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=6176#comment-176713how can the society benefit from this?!
what are the place of pure mathematicians in the society?
]]>
By: Anonymous
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/a-partial-converse-to-bezouts-theorem/#comment-176710
Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:55:06 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=6176#comment-176710prof,
can u make a post of applied maths and numerical analysis? or link me up with any blog that involve those two field.
]]>
By: Terence Tao
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/a-partial-converse-to-bezouts-theorem/#comment-175429
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:45:15 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=6176#comment-175429Dense in the combinatorial sense (the density is bounded away from zero), rather than the algebraic (Zariski) sense. I’ll edit the post to clarify this.
]]>
By: Allen Knutson
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/a-partial-converse-to-bezouts-theorem/#comment-175427
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:42:10 +0000http://terrytao.wordpress.com/?p=6176#comment-175427What did you mean by “dense” subset?
]]>