As in the previous post, all computations here are at the formal level only.
In the previous blog post, the Euler equations for inviscid incompressible fluid flow were interpreted in a Lagrangian fashion, and then Noether’s theorem invoked to derive the known conservation laws for these equations. In a bit more detail: starting with Lagrangian space and Eulerian space
, we let
be the space of volume-preserving, orientation-preserving maps
from Lagrangian space to Eulerian space. Given a curve
, we can define the Lagrangian velocity field
as the time derivative of
, and the Eulerian velocity field
. The volume-preserving nature of
ensures that
is a divergence-free vector field:
If we formally define the functional
then one can show that the critical points of this functional (with appropriate boundary conditions) obey the Euler equations
for some pressure field . As discussed in the previous post, the time translation symmetry of this functional yields conservation of the Hamiltonian
the rigid motion symmetries of Eulerian space give conservation of the total momentum
and total angular momentum
and the diffeomorphism symmetries of Lagrangian space give conservation of circulation
for any closed loop in
, or equivalently pointwise conservation of the Lagrangian vorticity
, where
is the
-form associated with the vector field
using the Euclidean metric
on
, with
denoting pullback by
.
It turns out that one can generalise the above calculations. Given any self-adjoint operator on divergence-free vector fields
, we can define the functional
as we shall see below the fold, critical points of this functional (with appropriate boundary conditions) obey the generalised Euler equations
for some pressure field , where
in coordinates is
with the usual summation conventions. (When
,
, and this term can be absorbed into the pressure
, and we recover the usual Euler equations.) Time translation symmetry then gives conservation of the Hamiltonian
If the operator commutes with rigid motions on
, then we have conservation of total momentum
and total angular momentum
and the diffeomorphism symmetries of Lagrangian space give conservation of circulation
or pointwise conservation of the Lagrangian vorticity . These applications of Noether’s theorem proceed exactly as the previous post; we leave the details to the interested reader.
One particular special case of interest arises in two dimensions , when
is the inverse derivative
. The vorticity
is a
-form, which in the two-dimensional setting may be identified with a scalar. In coordinates, if we write
, then
Since is also divergence-free, we may therefore write
where the stream function is given by the formula
If we take the curl of the generalised Euler equation (2), we obtain (after some computation) the surface quasi-geostrophic equation
This equation has strong analogies with the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations, and can be viewed as a simplified model for that system; see this paper of Constantin, Majda, and Tabak for details.
Now we can specialise the general conservation laws derived previously to this setting. The conserved Hamiltonian is
(a law previously observed for this equation in the abovementioned paper of Constantin, Majda, and Tabak). As commutes with rigid motions, we also have (formally, at least) conservation of momentum
(which up to trivial transformations is also expressible in impulse form as , after integration by parts), and conservation of angular momentum
(which up to trivial transformations is ). Finally, diffeomorphism invariance gives pointwise conservation of Lagrangian vorticity
, thus
is transported by the flow (which is also evident from (3). In particular, all integrals of the form
for a fixed function
are conserved by the flow.
— 1. Euler-Lagrange calculations —
We now justify the claim that stationary points of the functional obey (2). We consider continuous deformations
of the critical point
, thus
now depends on both
and
. We already have the Eulerian velocity field
, which is related to the
derivative of
by the formula
similarly we may introduce a deformation field by
The vector field is divergence free and has to obey appropriate vanishing conditions at infinity, but is otherwise unconstrained. If we compute
using the above two equations and the chain rule, we arrive at the “zero-curvature” condition
On the other hand, as is a critical point, we have
when . Differentiating under the integral sign and using the self-adjoint nature of
, the left-hand side is
Inserting (4) and integrating by parts (and using the divergence-free nature of ), this expression can be rewritten as
Since is essentially an arbitrary divergence-free vector field, the expression inside parentheses must vanish, and the equation (2) follows.
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
6 March, 2014 at 8:43 pm
Anonymous
At the end of the second sentence, do you mean ‘these equations’ instead of ‘this equation’.
[Corrected, thanks – T.]
25 June, 2014 at 1:48 am
Navier-Stokes Fluid Computers | Combinatorics and more
[…] here is a follow up post on Tao’s blog (and a few more II, III), and a post on Shtetl […]
19 April, 2015 at 4:58 pm
Embedding the SQG equation in a modified Euler equation | What's new
[…] where is the active scalar, and is the velocity field. The SQG equations are often used as a toy model for the 3D Euler equations, as they share many of the same features (e.g. vortex stretching); see this paper of Constantin, Majda, and Tabak for more discussion (or this previous blog post). […]