I’ve just uploaded to the arXiv my paper “Equivalence of the logarithmically averaged Chowla and Sarnak conjectures“, submitted to the Festschrift “Number Theory – Diophantine problems, uniform distribution and applications” in honour of Robert F. Tichy. This paper is a spinoff of my previous paper establishing a logarithmically averaged version of the Chowla (and Elliott) conjectures in the two-point case. In that paper, the estimate
as was demonstrated, where
was any positive integer and
denoted the Liouville function. The proof proceeded using a method I call the “entropy decrement argument”, which ultimately reduced matters to establishing a bound of the form
whenever was a slowly growing function of
. This was in turn established in a previous paper of Matomaki, Radziwill, and myself, using the recent breakthrough of Matomaki and Radziwill.
It is natural to see to what extent the arguments can be adapted to attack the higher-point cases of the logarithmically averaged Chowla conjecture (ignoring for this post the more general Elliott conjecture for other bounded multiplicative functions than the Liouville function). That is to say, one would like to prove that
as for any fixed distinct integers
. As it turns out (and as is detailed in the current paper), the entropy decrement argument extends to this setting (after using some known facts about linear equations in primes), and allows one to reduce the above estimate to an estimate of the form
for a slowly growing function of
and some fixed
(in fact we can take
for
), where
is the (normalised) local Gowers uniformity norm. (In the case
,
, this becomes the Fourier-uniformity conjecture discussed in this previous post.) If one then applied the (now proven) inverse conjecture for the Gowers norms, this estimate is in turn equivalent to the more complicated looking assertion
where the supremum is over all possible choices of nilsequences of controlled step and complexity (see the paper for definitions of these terms).
The main novelty in the paper (elaborating upon a previous comment I had made on this blog) is to observe that this latter estimate in turn follows from the logarithmically averaged form of Sarnak’s conjecture (discussed in this previous post), namely that
whenever is a zero entropy (i.e. deterministic) sequence. Morally speaking, this follows from the well-known fact that nilsequences have zero entropy, but the presence of the supremum in (1) means that we need a little bit more; roughly speaking, we need the class of nilsequences of a given step and complexity to have “uniformly zero entropy” in some sense.
On the other hand, it was already known (see previous post) that the Chowla conjecture implied the Sarnak conjecture, and similarly for the logarithmically averaged form of the two conjectures. Putting all these implications together, we obtain the pleasant fact that the logarithmically averaged Sarnak and Chowla conjectures are equivalent, which is the main result of the current paper. There have been a large number of special cases of the Sarnak conjecture worked out (when the deterministic sequence involved came from a special dynamical system), so these results can now also be viewed as partial progress towards the Chowla conjecture also (at least with logarithmic averaging). However, my feeling is that the full resolution of these conjectures will not come from these sorts of special cases; instead, conjectures like the Fourier-uniformity conjecture in this previous post look more promising to attack.
It would also be nice to get rid of the pesky logarithmic averaging, but this seems to be an inherent requirement of the entropy decrement argument method, so one would probably have to find a way to avoid that argument if one were to remove the log averaging.
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
17 May, 2016 at 4:17 am
Will
Did you mean “It was already know that the Chowla conjecture implies the Sarnak conjecture” instead of the other way around?
[Corrected, thanks -T]
17 May, 2016 at 5:27 am
Anonymous
It seems that the exponent
(in the estimate above (1)) does not appear in the arXiv paper.
[Ah, I had forgotten I had used the normalised Gowers norms in the paper rather than the non-normalised norms. The notation is now aligned -T.]
17 July, 2016 at 8:54 am
Notes on the Bombieri asymptotic sieve | What's new
[…] Chowla conjecture, for which there has been some recent progress (discussed for instance in these recent posts). Informally, the Bombieri asymptotic sieve lets us (on GEH) view the twin prime conjecture […]
5 March, 2017 at 10:38 am
Furstenberg limits of the Liouville function | What's new
[…] I was able to show that this conjecture was equivalent to the logarithmically averaged Chowla conjecture, and hence to […]
9 August, 2017 at 4:34 pm
The structure of logarithmically averaged correlations of multiplicative functions, with applications to the Chowla and Elliott conjectures | What's new
[…] be difficult (though perhaps not completely impossible if one allows for logarithmic averaging): in a previous paper I showed that achieving this in the context of the Liouville function would be equivalent to […]
5 December, 2018 at 3:02 pm
Fourier uniformity of bounded multiplicative functions in short intervals on average | What's new
[…] the same hypotheses on and . As I worked out in a previous paper, this conjecture would imply a logarithmically averaged three-point Chowla conjecture, implying for […]
30 July, 2020 at 7:12 pm
Higher uniformity of bounded multiplicative functions in short intervals on average | What's new
[…] as for any fixed and any that goes to infinity as , where is the (normalized) Gowers uniformity norm. Among other things this conjecture implies (logarithmically averaged version of) the Chowla and Sarnak conjectures for the Liouville function (or the Möbius function), see this previous blog post. […]