You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘eigenvalue gaps’ tag.
I’ve just uploaded to the arXiv my paper The asymptotic distribution of a single eigenvalue gap of a Wigner matrix, submitted to Probability Theory and Related Fields. This paper (like several of my previous papers) is concerned with the asymptotic distribution of the eigenvalues of a random Wigner matrix
in the limit
, with a particular focus on matrices drawn from the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE). This paper is focused on the bulk of the spectrum, i.e. to eigenvalues
with
for some fixed
.
The location of an individual eigenvalue is by now quite well understood. If we normalise the entries of the matrix
to have mean zero and variance
, then in the asymptotic limit
, the Wigner semicircle law tells us that with probability
one has
where the classical location of the eigenvalue is given by the formula
and the semicircular distribution is given by the formula
Actually, one can improve the error term here from to
for any
(see this previous recent paper of Van and myself for more discussion of these sorts of estimates, sometimes known as eigenvalue rigidity estimates).
From the semicircle law (and the fundamental theorem of calculus), one expects the eigenvalue spacing
to have an average size of
. It is thus natural to introduce the normalised eigenvalue spacing
and ask what the distribution of is.
As mentioned previously, we will focus on the bulk case , and begin with the model case when
is drawn from GUE. (In the edge case when
is close to
or to
, the distribution is given by the famous Tracy-Widom law.) Here, the distribution was almost (but as we shall see, not quite) worked out by Gaudin and Mehta. By using the theory of determinantal processes, they were able to compute a quantity closely related to
, namely the probability
that an interval near
of length comparable to the expected eigenvalue spacing
is devoid of eigenvalues. For
in the bulk and fixed
, they showed that this probability is equal to
where is the Dyson projection
to Fourier modes in , and
is the Fredholm determinant. As shown by Jimbo, Miwa, Tetsuji, Mori, and Sato, this determinant can also be expressed in terms of a solution to a Painleve V ODE, though we will not need this fact here. In view of this asymptotic and some standard integration by parts manipulations, it becomes plausible to propose that
will be asymptotically distributed according to the Gaudin-Mehta distribution
, where
A reasonably accurate approximation for is given by the Wigner surmise
, which was presciently proposed by Wigner as early as 1957; it is exact for
but not in the asymptotic limit
.
Unfortunately, when one tries to make this argument rigorous, one finds that the asymptotic for (1) does not control a single gap , but rather an ensemble of gaps
, where
is drawn from an interval
of some moderate size
(e.g.
); see for instance this paper of Deift, Kriecherbauer, McLaughlin, Venakides, and Zhou for a more precise formalisation of this statement (which is phrased slightly differently, in which one samples all gaps inside a fixed window of spectrum, rather than inside a fixed range of eigenvalue indices
). (This result is stated for GUE, but can be extended to other Wigner ensembles by the Four Moment Theorem, at least if one assumes a moment matching condition; see this previous paper with Van Vu for details. The moment condition can in fact be removed, as was done in this subsequent paper with Erdos, Ramirez, Schlein, Vu, and Yau.)
The problem is that when one specifies a given window of spectrum such as , one cannot quite pin down in advance which eigenvalues
are going to lie to the left or right of this window; even with the strongest eigenvalue rigidity results available, there is a natural uncertainty of
or so in the
index (as can be quantified quite precisely by this central limit theorem of Gustavsson).
The main difficulty here is that there could potentially be some strange coupling between the event (1) of an interval being devoid of eigenvalues, and the number of eigenvalues to the left of that interval. For instance, one could conceive of a possible scenario in which the interval in (1) tends to have many eigenvalues when
is even, but very few when
is odd. In this sort of situation, the gaps
may have different behaviour for even
than for odd
, and such anomalies would not be picked up in the averaged statistics in which
is allowed to range over some moderately large interval.
The main result of the current paper is that these anomalies do not actually occur, and that all of the eigenvalue gaps in the bulk are asymptotically governed by the Gaudin-Mehta law without the need for averaging in the
parameter. Again, this is shown first for GUE, and then extended to other Wigner matrices obeying a matching moment condition using the Four Moment Theorem. (It is likely that the moment matching condition can be removed here, but I was unable to achieve this, despite all the recent advances in establishing universality of local spectral statistics for Wigner matrices, mainly because the universality results in the literature are more focused on specific energy levels
than on specific eigenvalue indices
. To make matters worse, in some cases universality is currently known only after an additional averaging in the energy parameter.)
The main task in the proof is to show that the random variable is largely decoupled from the event in (1) when
is drawn from GUE. To do this we use some of the theory of determinantal processes, and in particular the nice fact that when one conditions a determinantal process to the event that a certain spatial region (such as an interval) contains no points of the process, then one obtains a new determinantal process (with a kernel that is closely related to the original kernel). The main task is then to obtain a sufficiently good control on the distance between the new determinantal kernel and the old one, which we do by some functional-analytic considerations involving the manipulation of norms of operators (and specifically, the operator norm, Hilbert-Schmidt norm, and nuclear norm). Amusingly, the Fredholm alternative makes a key appearance, as I end up having to invert a compact perturbation of the identity at one point (specifically, I need to invert
, where
is the Dyson projection and
is an interval). As such, the bounds in my paper become ineffective, though I am sure that with more work one can invert this particular perturbation of the identity by hand, without the need to invoke the Fredholm alternative.
Recent Comments