You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Stein’s method’ tag.
Consider the sum of iid real random variables
of finite mean
and variance
for some
. Then the sum
has mean
and variance
, and so (by Chebyshev’s inequality) we expect
to usually have size
. To put it another way, if we consider the normalised sum
then has been normalised to have mean zero and variance
, and is thus usually of size
.
In the previous set of notes, we were able to establish various tail bounds on . For instance, from Chebyshev’s inequality one has
and if the original distribution was bounded or subgaussian, we had the much stronger Chernoff bound
for some absolute constants ; in other words, the
are uniformly subgaussian.
Now we look at the distribution of . The fundamental central limit theorem tells us the asymptotic behaviour of this distribution:
Theorem 1 (Central limit theorem) Let
be iid real random variables of finite mean
and variance
for some
, and let
be the normalised sum (1). Then as
,
converges in distribution to the standard normal distribution
.
Exercise 2 Show that
does not converge in probability or in the almost sure sense. (Hint: the intuition here is that for two very different values
of
, the quantities
and
are almost independent of each other, since the bulk of the sum
is determined by those
with
. Now make this intuition precise.)
Exercise 3 Use Stirling’s formula from Notes 0a to verify the central limit theorem in the case when
is a Bernoulli distribution, taking the values
and
only. (This is a variant of Exercise 2 from those notes, or Exercise 2 from Notes 1. It is easy to see that once one does this, one can rescale and handle any other two-valued distribution also.)
Exercise 4 Use Exercise 9 from Notes 1 to verify the central limit theorem in the case when
is gaussian.
Note we are only discussing the case of real iid random variables. The case of complex random variables (or more generally, vector-valued random variables) is a little bit more complicated, and will be discussed later in this post.
The central limit theorem (and its variants, which we discuss below) are extremely useful tools in random matrix theory, in particular through the control they give on random walks (which arise naturally from linear functionals of random matrices). But the central limit theorem can also be viewed as a “commutative” analogue of various spectral results in random matrix theory (in particular, we shall see in later lectures that the Wigner semicircle law can be viewed in some sense as a “noncommutative” or “free” version of the central limit theorem). Because of this, the techniques used to prove the central limit theorem can often be adapted to be useful in random matrix theory. Because of this, we shall use these notes to dwell on several different proofs of the central limit theorem, as this provides a convenient way to showcase some of the basic methods that we will encounter again (in a more sophisticated form) when dealing with random matrices.
Recent Comments