Don’t just read it; fight it! Ask your own questions, look for your own examples, discover your own proofs. Is the hypothesis necessary? Is the converse true? What happens in the classical special case? What about the degenerate cases? Where does the proof use the hypothesis? (Paul Halmos, “I want to be a mathematician”)
When you learn mathematics, whether in books or in lectures, you generally only see the end product – very polished, clever and elegant presentations of a mathematical topic.
However, the process of discovering new mathematics is much messier, full of the pursuit of directions which were naïve, fruitless or uninteresting.
While it is tempting to just ignore all these “failed” lines of inquiry, actually they turn out to be essential to one’s deeper understanding of a topic, and (via the process of elimination) finally zeroing in on the correct way to proceed.
So one should be unafraid to ask “stupid” questions, challenging conventional wisdom on a subject; the answers to these questions will occasionally lead to a surprising conclusion, but more often will simply tell you why the conventional wisdom is there in the first place, which is well worth knowing.
For instance, given a standard lemma in a subject, you can ask what happens if you delete a hypothesis, or attempt to strengthen the conclusion; if a simple result is usually proven by method X, you can ask whether it can be proven by method Y instead; the new proof may be less elegant than the original, or may not work at all, but in either case it tends to illuminate the relative power of methods X and Y, which can be useful when the time comes to prove less standard lemmas.
It’s also acceptable, when listening to a seminar, to ask “dumb” but constructive questions to help clarify some basic issue in the talk (e.g. whether statement X implied statement Y in the argument, or vice versa; whether a terminology introduced by the speaker is related to a very similar sounding terminology that you already knew about; and so forth). If you don’t ask, you might be lost for the remainder of the talk; and usually speakers appreciate the feedback (it shows that at least one audience member is paying attention!) and the opportunity to explain things better, both to you and to the rest of the audience. However, questions which do not immediately enhance the flow of the talk are probably best left to after the end of the talk.
- Martin Schwartz, “The importance of stupidity in scientific research“,
70 comments
Comments feed for this article
11 July, 2023 at 5:00 am
When my dumbass learned waging a war of aggression is not a war crime and all those soldiers on the ‘bad guys’ side are not necessarily war criminals (or even criminals) via ATLA / TLOK and then I applied this to the 2022 chess candidates (202
[…] vs good guys in chess) side. Guess I never really gave it much thought. But eh as Terry Tao said Ask yourself dumb questions – and answer them! So yeah the 4th Nuremberg principle refers to if your superior orders you to commit war […]
1 August, 2023 at 8:11 am
When my dumbass learned waging a war of aggression is not a war crime and all those soldiers on the ‘bad guys’ side are not necessarily war criminals (or even criminals) via ATLA / TLOK and then I applied this to the 2022 chess candidates (202
[…] vs good guys in chess) side. Guess I never really gave it much thought. But eh as Terry Tao said Ask yourself dumb questions – and answer them! So yeah the 4th Nuremberg principle refers to if your superior orders you to commit war crimes. […]
22 September, 2023 at 9:49 am
9LX WC Wesley So loses to Amin and thought Amin prepared the move. | Mathematiciowned
[…] asked the r/Jewish mods on 2022Dec18 a dumb question […]
24 October, 2023 at 5:41 am
Brief remarks on the HSC Extension 2 Mathematics examinations – Jonathan Mui
[…] it is about learning to ask good questions and also not being afraid to ask basic or even ‘stupid’ questions (if this advice is good enough for Terry Tao, it’s good enough for you and me). These are two […]
1 November, 2023 at 6:58 pm
When my dumbass learned waging a war of aggression is not a war crime and all those soldiers on the ‘bad guys’ side are not necessarily war criminals (or even criminals) via ATLA / TLOK and then I applied this to the 2022 chess candidates (202
[…] vs good guys in chess) side. Guess I never really gave it much thought. But eh as Terry Tao said Ask yourself dumb questions – and answer them! So yeah the 4th Nuremberg principle refers to if your superior orders you to commit war crimes. […]
7 December, 2023 at 12:01 am
When my dumbass learned waging a war of aggression is not a war crime and all those soldiers on the ‘bad guys’ side are not necessarily war criminals (or even criminals) via ATLA / TLOK and then I applied this to the 2022 chess candidates (202
[…] vs good guys in chess) side. Guess I never really gave it much thought. But eh as Terry Tao said Ask yourself dumb questions – and answer them! So yeah the 4th Nuremberg principle refers to if your superior orders you to commit war crimes. […]
20 December, 2023 at 1:24 pm
When my dumbass learned waging a war of aggression is not a war crime and all those soldiers on the ‘bad guys’ side are not necessarily war criminals ( or even criminals ) via ATLA / TLOK and then I applied this to the 2022 chess candidates (
[…] vs good guys in chess) side. Guess I never really gave it much thought. But eh as Terry Tao said Ask yourself dumb questions – and answer them! So yeah the 4th Nuremberg principle refers to if your superior orders you to commit war crimes. […]
29 January, 2024 at 9:32 pm
Hacker Bits, Issue 97 - Hacker Bits
[…] Ask yourself dumb questions and answer them by Terence Tao […]
12 March, 2024 at 11:22 pm
When my dumbass learned waging a war of aggression is not a war crime and all those soldiers on the ‘bad guys’ side are not necessarily war criminals ( or even criminals ) via ATLA / TLOK and then I applied this to the 2022 chess candidates (
[…] vs good guys in chess) side. Guess I never really gave it much thought. But eh as Terry Tao said Ask yourself dumb questions – and answer them! So yeah the 4th Nuremberg principle refers to if your superior orders you to commit war crimes. […]