Here is a nice version of the periodic table (produced jointly by the Association for the British Pharmaceutical Industry, British Petroleum, the Chemical Industry Education Centre, and the Royal Society for Chemistry) that focuses on the applications of each of the elements, rather than their chemical properties. A simple idea, but remarkably effective in bringing the table to life.

It might be amusing to attempt something similar for mathematics, for instance creating a poster that takes each of the top-level categories in the AMS 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification scheme (or perhaps the arXiv math subject classification), and listing four or five applications of each, one of which would be illustrated by some simple artwork. (Except, of course, for those subfields that are “seldom found in nature”. :-) )

A project like this, which would need expertise both in mathematics and in graphic design, and which could be decomposed into several loosely interacting subprojects, seems amenable to a polymath-type approach; it seems to me that popularisation of mathematics is as valid an application of this paradigm as research mathematics. (Admittedly, there is a danger of “design by committee“, but a polymath project is not quite the same thing as a committee, and it would be an interesting experiment to see the relative strengths and weaknesses of this design method.) I’d be curious to see what readers would think of such an experiment.

[*Update*, Oct 25: A Math Overflow thread to collect applications of each of the major branches of mathematics has now been formed here, and is already rather active. Please feel free to contribute!]

[Via this post from the Red Ferret, which was suggested to me automatically via Google Reader’s recommendation algorithm.]

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

## 26 comments

Comments feed for this article

25 October, 2009 at 8:48 pm

Scott MorrisonI’ve just started a question over a mathoverflow: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2556/real-world-applications-of-mathematics-by-arxiv-subject-area . I hope some readers here will come and help out. I’m really curious to see if it will work!

26 October, 2009 at 9:58 am

Terence TaoLooks like it’s working pretty well so far; Overflow seems like quite a good platform for this sort of activity (collecting diverse examples of a given phenomenon). This will be quite a handy resource if we ever get around to the graphic design project mentioned in the main post.

26 October, 2009 at 12:04 am

John BaezDarn – I thought someone had come up with an applications-oriented version of the periodic table of n-categories.

Someday.

26 October, 2009 at 8:50 am

GilThere’s a problem with the pictures: with chemical elements we have physical objects to draw, but in mathematics it’s not always possible.

However with the right pictures this is a nice idea. Maybe we may start with geometry, the eastiest to draw and then just see if the project flows on =)

26 October, 2009 at 9:59 am

Terence TaoWell, the applications of mathematics are easier to draw than the mathematics itself. My hope is that if we get enough people working on the project, there will be sufficient artistic creativity to find good depictions of at least one of the applications for each major branch of mathematics.

26 October, 2009 at 10:08 am

Kareem CarrOne thing that’s been bugging me is that the diagram of the uses of elements already had a strong two dimensional representation to draw on, the periodic table. It is deceptively simple but quite dense in information.

I am wondering what that two dimensional representation ought to be in the case of mathematics. If one doesn’t exist, how might we go about generating one?

I thought perhaps the appropriate diagrammatic structure might be some kind of (directed?) graph rather than a table.

26 October, 2009 at 10:18 am

Terence TaoA graph would indeed make a lot of sense. One could imagine for instance the purer branches of mathematics pointing outward to the more applied branches, which in turn point out to actual applications. (Note that some applications would draw from multiple fields of mathematics; error-correcting codes, for instance.)

One difficulty: the graph is unlikely to be planar. (But perhaps one could use artistic devices to make the graph look three-dimensional.)

Tim Gowers made a mock-up of such a graph some time ago in his Clay Millennium talk “The importance of mathematics”, which should be locatable online.

26 October, 2009 at 10:38 am

Kareem Carrhttp://www.msri.org/publications/ln/hosted/cmi/2000/cmiparis/gowers_hibit/

I found this.

26 October, 2009 at 10:51 am

Terence TaoAh, thanks! The slides I had in mind are #14-16.

27 October, 2009 at 7:23 am

Michael LugoDavid Rusin has a map of mathematics (by top-level MSC subject classifications). His explanation says that two MSC classifications are near each other if they often are used on the same paper; this positions them in a certain high-dimensional space, and he gives a two-dimensional projection.

It’s hard to say explicitly what the two dimensions there represent. Top-bottom seems to be discrete-continuous. I

wantthe other dimension to be pure-applied but I don’t really see it.27 October, 2009 at 8:42 am

David SpeyerI’d say abstract versus concrete. The right hand side looks like the sort of fields that I associate with category theory, very infinite constructions and difficult machinary; the left I associate with detailed examples and clever tricks.

This isn’t the same as pure-applied: Quantum and Relativity are both on the right; Logic and Circuit theory are both on the left.

27 October, 2009 at 8:45 am

David SpeyerUgg. Circuit theory, of course, is very applied. I wasn’t thinking when I wrote that.

26 October, 2009 at 6:01 pm

Kareem CarrAssuming the slides aren’t based on data, I’ve been thinking about ways to generate the graph. My best idea so far is to use a google docs spreadsheet to record an adjacency matrix. The topics can be across the top and down the side. Depending on how large it is, it might take quite a few people to think about the relationships and google docs would support such a collaboration. I am hoping that we can also figure out the degree of relationships between fields and represent it with a number between 0 and 1 (perhaps based on the percent of people that think there is a relationship?) rather than just having a 0 for unrelated and a 1 for related.

27 October, 2009 at 12:17 am

Kareem CarrJust to be clear, I meant that google docs would be a reasonable way to generate the data needed to make the diagram; I wasn’t suggesting it as the end product.

26 October, 2009 at 10:38 pm

stew digglesI think, Kareem, Mr. T is talking about a professional-looking graphics presentation, molded by an artist; something that would rival the work done on the chemistry side. Don’t get me wrong, I love Google Docs, too, just not on the design front.

Big T, it looks like you’ve got a lot of pull around here, eh?

27 October, 2009 at 4:04 am

DilbertI don’t have an account but AT (knot theory) is used when dealing with protein foldning and other DNA issues.

[Added, thanks. -T.]27 October, 2009 at 10:23 am

HaraldSurely there’s a wonderful application of arsenic missing?

30 October, 2009 at 7:49 pm

Weekend miscellany — The Endeavour[…] Application-oriented periodic table […]

1 November, 2009 at 12:07 pm

Kareem CarrI have been thinking about the concept of a representation of the relationships between different parts of mathematics and I finally got around to making the visualizaton: http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/an-attempt-at-mapping-mathematics/

2 November, 2009 at 4:14 pm

Kareem CarrI made a small update where I adjusted the vertexes to have sizes proportional to the number of papers. The link is the same as above.

7 November, 2009 at 2:48 am

BallDo you think there are some online mathematics publication for general level? I am still not at the level to read specific mathematics journals, but I want to read some news about mathematics. For other science areas, I think Nature journal has done a good job. It contains some easier articles to help you to understand the more specific ones.

10 November, 2009 at 8:42 am

Hiten PatelI have a young boy (9 yo) who loves mathematics and chemistry. I have downloaded the periodic chart, and simply want to say thank you for posting. He will love this!

Also, I’d like to encourage the development of the mathematics chart. I am not a mathematician so do not understand the method that you propose in your post, but I do know that there is at least one customer out here for the end product! :)

Thanks.

Hiten

3 September, 2010 at 5:00 am

BreI am a 8th grade teacher in NC and came across your site while researching some information about the periodic table for my chemistry class this year. I just wanted to thank you for the great information and articles about the the periodic table.

We would love it if you could write a few articles for us, but I understand if your busy so a link to some of the current articles would be very helpful as well to help us spread trusted resources to other teachers. I have included a link to the site in case you would like to help us out by linking to it, tweeting it, or adding it to your Facebook profile.

http://www.thefreeresource.com/the-periodic-table-elements-symbols-and-atomic-numbers

Thanks and keep the great resources coming

Bre Matthews

11 July, 2013 at 9:57 am

Arturo OrtizI am sorry, but I could not find the *.pdf for the periodic table, based on applications:

http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/applications-oriented-periodic-table/

What happened? I really would like to have a look at it

11 July, 2013 at 10:42 am

anonFixed link:

http://www.abpi.org.uk/our-work/library/posters/Documents/Periodic-table-2005.pdf

In general, it’s often good to google for the name of the pdf to see if it has moved.

7 October, 2014 at 11:16 pm

David BThere is an updated table here: http://www.abpi.org.uk/our-work/library/posters/Documents/Periodic%20table%20Jan%2009.pdf